Absorbing, mysterious; of infinite richness, this life - Virginia Woolf


Showing posts with label Uganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Uganda. Show all posts

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Follow Up

On Thursday, Barack Obama issued a press statement expressing his condemnation of the murder of David Kato. It stated:
"I am deeply saddened to learn of the murder of David Kato. In Uganda, David showed tremendous courage in speaking out against hate. He was a powerful advocate for fairness and freedom. The United States mourns his murder, and we recommit ourselves to David’s work."
Obviously this is encouraging; frankly I'm amazed the murder received such a high-level response in such an explicit and pro-active manner. To the best of my knowledge, none of the killings of other particularly high-profile human rights activists such as Floribert Chebeya in the DRC, Natalya Estemirova in Russia, or Betty Cariño in Mexico received presidential responses. Equally, none of these cases have resulted in any credible investigations or prosecutions. But then again, it helps to give your life for a cause that enjoys an prominent place on the liberal agenda (and I say that with the proviso that this is the only occasion on which I'll ever describe the "liberal agenda" sarcastically).

The Obama administration has long been vocally critical of the violent homophobia currently manifesting itself in Uganda and other African states including Malawi. And indeed, in Thursday's statement Obama also made reference to the fact that in the week prior to David Kato's death, "five members of the LGBT community in Honduras were also murdered". In contrast to the (justified) international hysteria about the situation in Africa, there has been almost unbroken silence on routine killings in Honduras, where gay and transgender individuals have been amongst the greatest victims of the political instability since the 2009 Coup.

I don't have any facts to back this up, but my recollection is that by the time I left Front Line in October last year, at least 30 LGBTI had been killed already in the country that year. I do remember though that around the same time there was international outcry regarding the ten media workers killed in Honduras in 2010. Obviously that too is a disaster, particularly in terms of it's impact upon press freedom, and it requires immediate attention; but the murder of three times as many individuals counts for nothing because - unlike journalists - they have been silenced by fear and societal ostracism?

I'm getting off the point. When it comes to David Kato at least, I know that I shouldn't be so cynical, but I can't help a feeling of bitterness. Obama's statement was read out during his funeral yesterday, which must have been an incredible moment for his family and friends. But that was before the pastor presiding at the service called on homosexuals to repent or "be punished by God". The dozens of LGBTI in the congregation apparently reacted angrily; the pastor was escorted from the Church; and the attendees quickly dispersed after the burial because they had been threatened with violence by neighbours. The Guardian have a good report on it here.

I can't even comment on this, to be quite honest. Simply, I am deeply saddened, and remain as uncomprehending as I was when I wrote my last post.

As is the custom in Uganda, they took him back to his home town in bury him; all things in Africa seem to come originally from "the village", and in the end, it is to the village that everyone returns. I must have passed through Namataba several times on my way to and from Jinja, but I have no recollection of the place. I imagine the women in their best gomesi; the buzzing midday heat; the matatu taxis in which they packed into to travel from Kampala. No doubt the matoke was steaming in banana leaves for the meal afterwards. I can imagine the scene as they listened to what Barack Obama had said about the man they were burying; I just have no idea what it could have meant to them.

The White House press statement on David Kato can be read in full here.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

David Kato

I met David Kato in February 2010 at the Dublin Platform, a large conference for human rights defenders organised by Front Line. He was a Ugandan LGBTI activist, outspoken, forceful, loud. I think I can be honest in saying I wasn't his biggest fan - I was amongst a small army of interns and volunteers with whom he was sometimes demanding and unhelpful. But inside, in the main conference room, he described the death threats and tension and fear inherent in homosexuality in Africa.

Today I heard that yesterday afternoon, someone broke into his house in Mukono, a suburb on the road from Kampala to Jinja, and beat him to death. He was 42 years old. In the interests of impartiality and unproven facts, I should report that a police investigation is underway and the motivation for the killing has not yet been determined. But I think objectivity might today be somewhat less important than saying David Kato was bludgeoned to death with either a hammer or iron bar not only because he was gay, but because he was publicly so.

Last October, a few months after I left Kampala, a local newspaper - Rolling Stone - printed the names, photographs and home addresses of "Uganda's most notorious homos" under a headline that said "Hang Them". David Kato's picture was on the front page. He and two other activists recently won a court case ordering the newspaper to stop printing names and addresses of homosexuals. The editor of Rolling Stone today commented on the murder, condemning it and claiming that the paper's aim had not been to encourage public attacks.
"We want the government to hang people who promote homosexuality, not for the public to attack them."
Right.

I want to be able to write something insightful and incisive about this. I want to analyse and dissect and clarify the politics of this act. But I can't. I can't explain, and I can't understand. Sure, I know something about African concepts of sexuality, traditionalism and social conservatism. I could copy and paste something from Wikipedia about the central importance of Christian faith in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly of Evangelical churches, and of African believers' deep-rooted, often literal belief in the Word of God. I could try to arrange my thoughts coherently about the current trend for homosexuals as the scapegoats du jour, conveniently ostracised so that they can aid all manner of distraction from continuing social fragmentation, economic stagnation and the covert consolidation of political power.

Except that I can't do any of that, because I know the given reasons and I still don't understand. What interests me greatly about the brutal persecution of LGBTI around the world is how, really, they pose no overt or apparent challenge to authority. It is somewhat inevitable that the pro-democracy activists of Iran or the freedom of speech advocates of China will suffer; without meaning to denigrate, such repression is relatively straightforward and that type of restrictive or intimidating behaviour on the part of the State intensifies, in a logical fashion, in direct correlation to the level of threat posed to authority by the activist.

So what interests exactly do gay individuals challenge? Moral authority? Religious sentiment? Societal consensus? Obviously the emergence of a group of politically-aware, organised and motivated individuals is never in the interest of a government with authoritarian tendencies, but there are far bigger groups of mobilised activists in Uganda who march for different causes, and who pose a far larger threat to the political authorities. As for a threat to the established order, that may be a different matter of course. There are many figures of authority throughout Ugandan society other than the government whose interests may be threatened by liberalisation of societal mores and structures. Is the LGBTI movement really strong or large enough to constitute such a threat? I can't see it.

Of course, all the authority figures considered above probably fear the incremental effects that might originate with an initial loosening of anti-homosexuality laws (the floodgate principle). But it's also true to say that most African homosexuals hardly demand gay marriage right now. I simply imagine that most would be relieved just to avoid the death penalty, life in prison, or prison sentences for friends, family and colleagues who are aware of their sexual orientation.

So I don't understand. I don't understand why some individual - whoever he was (and I only presume it was a he, because of prejudices of my own that I don't fully understand either) took the matter into his own hands. I don't know why this individual thought either that David Kato needed to be silenced, to be put in his place, that a message needed to be sent to other activists, or that this was a righteous act in defence of the community.

What I do understand is the direct link between this act and the generally accepted environment of discrimination - nay, persecution - towards LGBTI that has been established in Uganda and several other African countries through the use of language, rhetoric, the media, the churches and general hysteria, which has been condoned if not actively encouraged by both political and social authority figures. I can only hope this might lead to some of the debate about accountability and responsibility which followed the Tucson shooting in Arizona. Sadly, I doubt it.

How does Giles Muhame, the editor of Rolling Stone, feel tonight? Does he believe his own statement on the case?

I feel dreadful tonight, thinking about this. For most of the afternoon I felt physically sick. My thoughts are with David Kato's family and friends, and with the LGBTI community. I don't understand.

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

Ireland

I'm home.

There's a whole world contained in those two words, most of which I can't really explain here. If there are any takers out there for a pint and a boozy chat, it might be possible. On paper (can you call a blog "paper"?!) I don't have the time or the energy right now. I would say that I haven't formulated most of it yet, except that - as I always knew would be the case - after only four days back in Ireland, my Ugandan experience is already slipping away from me, and I have a terrible fear that if I don't write about it very soon it'll slip away from me forever.

I flew out from Kampala on Friday night, and arrived back in my small little Irish home town on Saturday lunchtime. By Sunday afternoon I was already on my way to Dublin and on Monday morning I was back at my old desk in the office, fumbling my way uselessly through the same work I was fluent with a few months ago.

There's so much I haven't written about - so many things happening, so many places seen, new people befriended, new journeys made, new events (some magical, some tragic and horrifying). This blog was as much for myself, to remember things, as it was for anyone to read about them. The month of lost blogging thus really does seem a loss - too many things I'll have forgotten, some day. It's not that I gave up blogging the past month, its simply that circumstances conspired against it. Armenia swallowed a large chunk of my Ugandan time - I spent ten days away. I spent a week recovering (literally - a large proportion of the week after I came back was spent in bed recovering from some kind of bug I picked up along the way). I spent another week almost totally without internet in the office, frantically trying to wrap up the work I needed to finish before my successor, Daniel, would arrive for a handover. My last week in the office was only three days long, all of which was swallowed by workshops, speeches and the launch (a big deal) of the Human Right's Centre's first report. And then I spent about a week traveling with two friends through southwest Uganda and Rwanda before coming back to Kampala to fly home.

It would take me days to write about our Great East African Road Trip. Suffice to say it involved:
  • Crossing the Equator for the first time. Disappointingly the world is not as upside and back to front down there as one would hope.
  • A series of long-winded bus journeys, the last of which was ten hours long, which all seemed to involve broken bags, babies on laps, questionable roadside food, near-death experiences on Rwandan mountaintops, Nigerian soap operas, Christian music, the total absence of personal space, amorous Ugandan and Rwandan men, out of date newspapers, postal deliveries and sore bladders.
  • An inexhaustible succession of Scandinavians of various shapes and sizes.
  • Africa's deepest lake, and wooden dugout canoes upon it, and fish inside it, diving into it, and lying in hammocks beside it.
  • Day-long card games, which no one ever won.
  • An earthquake. Yes, really, an earthquake. It was a good 5-10 seconds long and as thrilling as it was bloody frightening.
  • Crayfish. Oh god, so much crayfish. So delectably good. Sigh.
  • Omelets. Some good, some bad, always reliable.
  • Unfathomable and indecipherable exchange rates. I currently have six different currencies in my purse.
  • Walking to the Congo, standing and looking at the Congo, and ultimately failing to get into the Congo. Must go back to climb the volcano another time.
  • Incorruptible Rwandan border guards. We would know - we tried our very best to corrupt one, and emerged morally bankrupt. Absolute shame on us.
  • Children - hugging us, squealing at us, being dumped on our laps. Life affirming.
  • Genocide memorials. Really nothing witty I can say about this.
  • Terrorism.
This last one is nothing to joke about either. 76 people were killed in Kampala on 11 July while they watched the World Cup Final. A week later there is still very little I can say about this. All the usual adjectives apply - sickening, horrifying, terrifying - and all of them seem very pointless because they are so obvious. Something like this deserves something more than words, or perhaps something less. Perhaps only silence can suffice.

We were safely in Rwanda when we heard the news, and thankfully no friends or colleagues were affected. This is less surprising than you might think - one of the bombs, at the Ethiopian Village Restaurant, went off in my neighbourhood, Kabalagala (which I've written about before), about halfway between home and the office. I've driven past twice a day for the past three months; I've eaten there before. If I had been in Kampala I probably would have been in a neighbouring bar or restaurant that night - in fact a good friend of mine was in a place just up the street and heard the explosion. But noises and whooshes and bangs happen all the time in Kabalagala, especially on the night of the World Cup Final, and no one took any notice. Fifteen people died in that whoosh.

I've been trying to explain to people that while you in Ireland or Europe or North America might think that these things happen "out there" all the time, in those far flung places whose names are linked to suicide bombings every week, these things did not happen in Kampala. Security concerns in Kampala involved taking precautions against petty theft, or avoiding political rallies and protest demonstrations where rowdiness and beatings are a growing trend in the run-up to the elections. No one worried about bombs and fundamentalism and extremists. Kampala was - and is - a city of bars, and shacks selling beers, and restaurants with live music; a town obsessed with football, where even the rundown local joints screened satellite channels from South Africa; a place where a typical Friday night out involved changing your bar every hour until 5am, before sipping beers through the sunrise and dryly taking a boda boda home after grabbing the first rolex from a street vendor at 7.00.

Bombs in bars didn't happen in Kampala. I only returned on Thursday night before flying out on Friday, but you could see the place was jumpy. People are calling in suspicious packages to the police, and shopping bags are checked by security guards going into shopping centres. The embassies send regular text messages with up dates to ex-pats. Yet even still, town was buzzing. "The jam" was as bad as ever, the street food sellers were doing their usual trade, and although the Western muzungu bars were probably deserted, friends have told me wild stories about spontaneous house parties that were thrown up around town all weekend.

I hated hearing about them: I wasn't there. I was watching soft, gray Irish rain beat off the window panes in Kerry, paying €3 for a cup of the coffee I'd so craved, hearing - before I saw - the girls in fake tans and tracksuits. Well, that's a harsh invocation - Ireland's really not that bad. Today, my second day at the office, was better than yesterday, my first. True, the sun was shining today, and I'd forgotten how beautiful Dublin is when you take the train out along the bay; had forgotten the smell of the sea; was startled once again by how O'Connell Bridge at 8.30 on a fine summer morning has the strange quality of a film set - tidy, vivid, wide, calm. And yet, still, what continues to upset me is not that I'm so unhappy here but the fact that I'm already settling back in; the fact that I can get on very well outside Uganda and that I'm already forgetting it and re-adjusting, faster than I want to.

You don't realise how immersed you are in Africa until you leave it; going to Armenia and then returning was in this sense a very strange and emotive experience for me. Reverse culture shock for me isn't, after all, the unfamiliarity of what should be the home environment. It isn't no longer feeling at home in your own place, amongst your own people. It isn't seeing the same old same old with new eyes, marvelling at what you never bothered to notice before.

Reverse culture shock for me, upsetting and disorientating, is in fact the inevitable, crushing sameness of everything when you come back. Nothing has changed. This is obvious, as much to me as it is to you, reading this, and its the almost-sense of shame and stupidity that comes from knowing this and recognising this, the whole, well, what else did you expect?

I've tried to reason it all out the past four days. The obvious answers are: you have changed, and home has not. You have changed, but the people at home have not, and most of them cannot relate, and most of them really aren't all that interested anyway. Other friends who have traveled to the developing world have talked to me about how friends, family and acquaintances project a defensiveness when you return - even if you were never to talk about your experiences, they expect you to, and expect you to express dissatisfaction - which they take to be a criticism of themselves - and expect you, somehow, to project a sense of superiority because of what you've done and where you've been. And even if this couldn't be further from the truth, it won't make any difference to those who'll keep you at arm's length because they expect to find you changed. And you don't want that to be the case; you just want your friends, who you very likely missed while you were away.

Reverse culture shock is all of these things, and yet for me that's not exactly it either. In addition to all of that, there is the sameness of things flattening everything else out. The sameness took the good out of all the modern conveniences that I looked forward to my last week in Africa, trying to console myself at the thought of going home: the long hot showers, the drinking water direct from the tap, the bewildering choice of food, the fast internet, the being able to go out alone after dark. Home is so utterly and crushingly the same, from the instant that you get back here, that all these things are just the same too, unnoticed and unappreciated. I thought I would have forgotten how to drive, or would marvel at the hundreds of choices in Tesco, but I did not. I thought I'd never been able to choose what to eat for lunch, but I just got on with it, and that was what was most upsetting.

No matter how long I'd been in Uganda, no matter how comfortable I felt there, every so often there would come a moment - of beauty, of kindness, of friendship or simply of something random that could only happen in Africa - and you'd jump in your own skin, look around and think - This is amazing. How did this happen? How did I get here? I can't believe this is my life now!

Yesterday, running late for work, lacking change for the bus, getting wet in the rain - that crap Irish half-rain, muggy and humid with mildness - it was my very first day and yet simultaneously so eternally as if I'd never been away. And I looked around and though.... how did this happen? how did I get here? is this really my life?

Because when I thought about where I had been only five days ago - bumping on buses over the Rwandan hills and the Ugandan plains, laughing about nicknames with Jenny and John, being welcomed by the Rwandan border guards who remembered us from passing through on our way the week before, flying on a boda boda through the balmy Ugandan evening, being called Auntie by Mama Sharon and Paul the boda driver, looking at Kampala's twinkling nighttime hills with Paulo, having pizza while surrounded by friends on my sofa, getting ridiculous text messages from Hubert, seeing the tears in Sharon's eyes, guiltily thinking of the people I didn't even get to see before I left, eating chapatti, gossiping over lunch with everyone from the office, listening to the birdsong and the rooster crowing and the call to prayer in the morning, counting banana trees on my way to the airport - I had no idea how I had come from there to here in what seemed like the passing of a few moments. The idea that all of that was over was so deeply upsetting. I wasn't ready for it to end. I still amn't.

I don't know if I'll keep blogging. If I have the time there are stories and thoughts about my last weeks there which I'd like to write about. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the kind of thing which simply loses momentum in the atmosphere of home, although I try to tell myself I'll be different this time. Perhaps this is my last entry, until my next travels; the thought makes me think of the very last anecdote I have from Uganda, and of how perfect - in summing up, and in all the hopes I have for the future - it was.

On my last morning I went to a supermarket to buy an extra bag for my luggage. I took a cheap holdall to the till, where the man whose job is to pack your shopping bags picked it up and turned it over, folded and unfolded it, opened and closed it, and handed it to me as if he'd made it ready for me.

"Thank you please. This is a very good bag," he said, and it wasn't small talk. He really meant it. "You must be planning a journey if you are buying a bag. Eghh. I wish you safe travels ,and good health wherever you will go with it."



Thursday, May 27, 2010

Jinja

View from the campsite

I spent last weekend in Jinja, known internationally as the source of the Nile, and known locally as backpacker central. I've come to the conclusion that Jinja – specifically its whitewater rafting – is probably the single most popular tourist attraction in Uganda. Not that many tourists in the traditional sense of the word flock there (the upmarket safari types probably aren't interested in staying in campsites as opposed to eco-lodges, for example) but I have yet to meet a single volunteer, intern or backpacker who hasn't been there, or didn't recommend it. For most of them, Jinja seems to be on the agenda for their very first weekend in Uganda. And now I am one of them too. It was wonderful!

It's not every day that you get to say you've spent the weekend on (and in!) the River Nile, particularly crashing over its youthful rapids and waterfalls, taking frequent dips (or being violently thrown) in its green waters, eating pineapple while floating along and admiring the view of papyrus, fish eagles, fruit bats, women washing clothes, boys paddling wooden canoes, and of course, the massive new concrete damn that will flood the whole of this stretch of river within the next year or so. I'm usually not the adventure junkie type (my idea of watersports on school trips was a run on the banana boat in Castlegregory) but when in Rome, one must assimilate with the other muzungus somehow. It was good clean fun (bar one good fright on the last run, and some terrible sunburn which I'm still tending five days later) and truly superb exercise - I expected sore shoulders from the paddling but my whole body ached the next day. Taking up canoeing when I get back home would be such an appealing option if it didn't involve mucky grey Irish mornings on mucky wet rivers.

Jinja itself is a lovely spot. It's small, it's quiet, and the only real nightspot is the bar at the campsite full of your fellow muzungu rafters. But what a campsite – on a cliff overlooking the river, with decent food, cheap drinks, secluded safari tents, the nicest dorms I've yet seen in Uganda and an up-market sister next door who rents out her pool to poor backpackers like myself. One (hungover) Sunday of chilling out and enjoying the place wasn't enough, and I wished I could have stayed a few days more with nothing but a good book, swimsuit and possibly a bicycle to keep me occupied.

The campsite was in fact a small island of the West in a sea of Ugandan countryside. A small village selling chapati and crafts for the muzungus had grown up outside the gate, but a short walk beyond that was “the village” itself. Maize, huts, dirt paths, chickens, children and nothing else. Belgian Anke, Australian Elsie and I went for a walk on Sunday afternoon, just listening to the quiet of the countryside and looking around.





Backpackers from the hostel must walk down that same road every single day, in search for “Uganda” or “Africa”, just like ourselves. Did the people living there resent or distrust the three white girls who, no matter how well-intended, must have looked at them like a tourist attraction, like a cultural exhibit? Did they feel invaded by what must be an inevitable, daily stream of girls just like us? Do they never get tired of white folk in their four wheel drives and trucks and quad bikes, tearing up the dirt roads and raising clouds of dust?

Do the villagers have any comprehension of why so many people would pay so much money just to throw themselves down the river on little rafts? It must seem like the most pointless – and unnecessarily dangerous – exercise imaginable to people preoccupied with feeding themselves, caring for flocks of children, washing clothes in the river, continuously patching up their wattle-and-daub clay huts. But did any of them look at us with anything like the irritation that I will honestly admit to frequently experiencing while living in touristy Kerry? Not in the slightest. Women waved to us, children followed us, men made jokes and teased us but in a good natured way so that when we joked back, everyone just laughed.


"Muzung food" mmm...

Nathan outside his mother's craft shop, pretending to paint the pictures in the background

At the end of the rafting course, everyone piles into an open-sided truck to be driven back to the campsite, perhaps 10 kilometres away. The bumpy dirt road runs through villages, past shops and schools and churches as well as through farm land. There were at least 20 people in our truck, all of us exhausted after a day of exertion which in a typically western way achieved precisely nothing (except to make money for the English-owned rafting company). There must have been a minimum of three or four trucks passing along that evening. All these trucks bump past every single day of the year, possibly twice a day, so although the villages are not exactly on the main road or even relatively near Jinja town, the villagers aren't exactly unused to seeing white folk passing through.

Yet the excitement as the trucks bumped past was electric. Children lined the road almost the whole length of the journey, waving and cheering, wagging both their arms vigorously in the air, while their mothers and teenaged compatriots, less visibly enthusiastic (as if not to look uncool!) but as if they couldn't help themselves, joined in. For a brief moment the circus had come to town, and the clowns, the jokers, the jesters were on parade with their cast of local guides – harlequin interlopers - stacks of red rafts, curious kayaks and court robes of life jacket and helmet.

It made me feel ashamed and humbled, all at once.

Why the hell shouldn't someone come over here with a good commercial idea, run a wildly successful business and make money from it in a way which harms no one? Why the hell shouldn't I decided to spend my hard-earned (and being honest, meagre) allowance enjoying myself? To think otherwise – that only aid workers and teachers and other categories of saints have the moral right to go to the villages, that making a profit on something in Africa poses a moral challenge, that tourism here is insensitive – is simply patronising.

The moral complexity arises from the lack of cyncism and the lack of resentment. I feel sometimes crushed by the inequality of living standards and wealth and privilege, so I am upset and bewildered by the fact that many Ugandans do not. This says more about me than it does about them: about liberal guilt and the Western concept of life.

I don't mean at all to suggest that the villagers are saints, living out peaceful sustainable lives with the same innocence as their children. You only have to look to the anxiety about next year's elections or deal with civil society as we do at work, to see that Ugandans very much want more and demand better, and can blame politicians and society and other people for their woes, and are well capable of anger and frustration.

But within the microcosm of the village, on a Sunday afternoon walk, that fades away. It's not even the poverty itself that shocks me: it is the attitudes surrounding it. We see poverty as something to be corrected. They don't see it at all - it just is. I realise that I am shocked and surprised when I don't see cynicism, jealousy, resentment or blame. Really, this tells me little about the villagers.

What instead does it tell me about me??


Some pictures of Jinja town itself...







Monday, May 24, 2010

Food

Papaya tree at the office

Everyday we collect “local” food – i.e. Ugandan, or “African” as they call it here sometimes – from a lady down the road, Mama Brenda, who cooks everything outdoors over charcoal, partly shaded by a thatched shack. I can never finish it, rarely need to eat again in the evenings and it costs under a euro. The chickens running around her garden will be in the pot in a few days' time, and the vegetable patch out the back is the source of most of the plantain, potatoes, greens, maize and onions. For no other reason, I like to support her initiative: she's running a successful business which she provides for her family. Moreso, the food fulfils the holy aspirations of western eco-foodies: locally produced, in season, organic, sustainable, and almost totally oil-free: everything is steamed or boiled, other than meats which are stewed.

But... sometimes I'd give anything for some brown soda bread with a bowl of tomato soup. Or a salad. Or anything else, in fact. Not even because I want them that much, but just because I'd like to choose something else. The same food five days a week, after two months, becomes monotonous. As choice goes, Mama Brenda has plenty to offer, but I will quietly (ssssh) that all African food more or less tastes the same.

You pick two or three of: matoke (steamed banana/plantain, Uganda's most ubiquitous staple), posho (a stiff, thick sort of porridge or dough which is more well known as ugali – a variation exists in almost every African country), potatoes, cassava or rice, with a potential chapatti to go on the side. There'll be a spoonful of steamed greens, and then you choose between beans, chicken, fish (tilapia – the local speciality from Lake Victoria. Large, thick, meaty white fish – very good grilled but a lot of bones to negotiate) or “meat”.

“Meat” is beef, but not in the sense we'd know it at home. Beef here is just a generic piece of cow – they don't butcher in different cuts the way we do. Slow beef stews aren't bad, it's usually chewy and tough. Also I've seen how the meat is bloodily delivered to market uncovered on the backs of trucks and even bodas, where it hangs amidst the sun and flies outside a butcher's shack all day before being sold. I'm not generally a fan.

I really do like tilapia – its a tender, beautifully translucent fish – but Mama Brenda usually cooks it in groundnut sauce (another ubiquitous local speciality) which I'm not too fond of.

Chicken is universally the most expensive option in Uganda. Mysteriously, chicken breasts do not exist here. Where do they go?! Do Africans really throw away the meatiest part of the chicken?? If you ask for chicken, you receive a drumstick or the wing-bone with meat attacked, both of which require lots of messy deconstruction and picking for very little return in fatty meat. The others in the office see chicken as a luxury – I'm the only one who ever takes it – so between all of that I don't have it very often.

Which leaves me with beans. Lots and lots of beans. Fresh local beans are stewed so they literally look like the dog's dinner, but they don't taste bad. With rice and a sweet potato or matoke, usually. And that's about it, five days a week.

Mama Brenda's menu sounds like a lot of choice, but now you can see why at times, I'd give away my right arm for a toasted special or slice of quiche. I can't help it - I'm getting so sick of eating 85% carbs every day. Meat and veg are very much side dishes here. Every day I ask for the steamed greens which are the only vegetables on offer, but Mama Brenda never gives more than a large teaspoon. It looks so little on top of a mound of starch that to me, it's almost laughable. People generally eat very little meat here – its too expensive for most people. A portion of chicken is a drumstick; a portion of meat perhaps two or three small, stir-fry-sized pieces. The star of the show here is the starch: a small mountain of carbs to fill your lunch box.

There are some things I'll genuinely miss when I'm gone: I've become particularly attached to a brand of flowery, fragrant Ugandan green tea, and the fruit here is honestly and truly out of this world. To give you an idea, the pineapples we get at home are half the size and sweetness of what's available here. Mangoes fall out of the trees, avocados grow in the bushes, and my latest habit is to slice open a passion fruit and tip the pulp into my cereal in the morning. Yum. Pity I don't like bananas – 30 different types grow in Uganda, and they're absolutely everywhere, included in every meal. My personal favourite is gonja – a type of green banana which needs to be cooked, which is roasted on little charcoal fires by the roadside. Served hot, gonja is savoury, sweet, morish, and costs about 15c.

Mangoes growing on our tree at the office

More often than not we talk about food while eating at work. Immaculate, our other intern, is always curious as to what I think of everything, being the token muzungu in the office. Today its pumpkin; Mama Brenda has started cooking it only recently and Sharon's been the first to try some. Do we have pumpkin in Ireland? Everyone is surprised to hear yes, but confused to hear that it's only available in autumn. Seasonal food has limited meaning on the equator – the weather changes so little that most of the staples down here grow all year round; they stagger the planting to have food available all year.

Anyway – in Kampala I have European food several times a week in the evenings or weekends, and I can buy almost anything I want in the good supermarkets in town. I complain but in fact I have lots of choice compared to muzungus living upcountry in the “the village”, and compared to Ugandans who can only afford to buy local food from the market. I do bring lunch from home at times, but we don't have a fridge, a microwave or even much cutlery (if the office is busy a few of us revert to teaspoons) so it's not always an easy option.

But god help me, I'm putting on weight. And people are happy to tell me so.

I was standing at the counter chatting to Sharon the other morning when Immaculate walked in.

“Tara, you are growing fat!” she exclaimed cheerfully.

“Ergh, thanks Immaculate. You look nice today”.

She shrugged off the compliment, oblivious to the sarcasm. “Yes, you are definitely getting fat”, she said happily, tilting her head to examine my figure.

At least I've been here long enough to know that this is not glee at my misfortune or a particular form of feminized politics. In the village, size is a sign of prosperity and the blessing of sufficient good food, but here in Kampala amongst people who are well off, we often chat about diets and weight and the same things women do back home.

“Well you know, Immaculate, I keep telling you about how I'm not used to the food down here. What else can you expect eating matoke every day,” I mutter.

She beamed with pride. “Ahh I told you you'd get to like matoke - you'll even miss it when you go home!”

I do like matoke, but it's highly doubtful that I won't be able to live without it. Immaculate's not the first person who has proudly suggested I'll miss good honest African food when I'm gone. I'm just too polite to tell them otherwise.

“You'll go back to Ireland and tell everyone how good our food is!” Immaculate added.

So the truth is that 'getting fat' is not itself the good thing – my putting on weight is a compliment to the food itself, rather than to me. Immaculate means matoke is “good” because it is effective – filling, nutritious, fattening. She's delighted that I'll go home and tell everyone that our flimsy European bread has nothing on their African staples. It couldn't make me put on weight like the matoke did, even if I tried! This, in fact, is patriotism and ethnic pride.

How simple life would be if this concept was the norm at home – if we congratulated ourselves on the fine density of our spuds and scoffed at outsiders with their light, easily-digestible alternatives. Uganda is so lush and fertile, so abundant with food even in poor areas, that I don't mean to disparage that which truly is a blessing – Uganda's ability to feed itself, unlike so many poor neighbours. Even in Kampala, food is visibly growing everywhere: on trees and in the ground, in gardens and on road sides, and in tiny triangles and corners of free land. It is indeed something to be grateful for, and proud of, and it's inevitable that this becomes embodied in the culture.


Maize which Joan is growing behind the office

Perhaps this leads to the spirit of generosity embodied in food. Sharon and I both feel the portions Mama Brenda gives us are too big; we eat too much and then up throwing away the rest. Its not that Sharon doesn't ask for smaller portions when she goes to collect lunch for everyone – the problem is that Mama won't give her less. As in, literally, won't allow her to take a smaller portion. We'd happily pay the same amount for less food, but the nyabo won't hear of it. Whether she thinks we need to eat more, or whether she's afraid that we'll be unhappy customers, we don't know. We just aren't allowed to have small ladies' lunches.

Similarly there was an outcry when Sharon and I recently got lunch from the Italian supermarket down the hill rather than from Mama Brenda. We collected lunch as usual for the others, but looking for a bit of variety ourselves we went across the road to the supermarket's lunch counter, where metal dishes of food are laid out in a glass display and optimistically called a “buffet”. For 5,000 shillings, as opposed to 3,000 shillings (about €1.50 rather than €1) we could have sweetly spiced pilau rice, multi-coloured vegetables cooked with tomatoes, peas (instead of beans), different types of potato, and a few other dishes which Mama Brenda never makes.

Back at the office, the others peered over their lunchboxes to look at our food and sniffed at it appreciatively. They begrudgingly looked impressed, until they asked how much it was. “5,000!” they exclaimed. “For so little!”

It wasn't at all little: it was a big box full of food, and it was more than enough. But we only had a choice of two dishes instead of three or four. So the others scoffed at it – none more loudly than one of the girls who usually makes a point of eating half of what Mama Brenda gives her, before throwing the rest away.

Is this patriotism, or stinginess, or loyalty to Mama Brenda? Or the just the fussiness of people who very rarely eat different types of food? (I know plenty of those down in Kerry, after all.)

Who knows. Either way, it's not going to help me fit back into my skinny jeans when I get home.

Friday, May 21, 2010

A Day in the Life

I actually wrote this a week ago; due to a few things going on in work which I mention, I thought it best to leave it until now before posting.

It's a bit of a long one - you've been warned! ....but there was no other way to cover the full range of unpredictability in a Ugandan day.


Thursday evening in Kampala. I'm sitting outside an internet café with my laptop balanced on my knee, watching the bustling Kabalagala evening pass by, just down the hill from Muyenga. The upholstered bench I'm sitting on looks exactly like the benches they place beside departure gates at airports, and given that it's probably been reclaimed from somewhere else, its entirely plausible that's exactly where it used to be found. On the other half of my bench sits a Ugandan woman who runs the clothes shop next door; it's more or less a hole in the wall hung with brightly coloured dresses and shirts. On a plastic garden chair beside her sits another local woman; the two of them are probably in their twenties or thirties. Business is slow this evening so they're gossiping and chatting, sometimes doubled over in laughter. Funny how you can identify flirting and salacious gossip even in a foreign language.

People cluster around the mouth of the internet café, where I sit tapping my laptop and admiring the view. Thumping African music is playing quietly on a speaker inside so that all you can hear is the bass and the rhythm, and people waiting for computers sit outside the entrance on other benches, so that the people wandering up and down the road stop and congregate. A man wanders by with a closed Tupperware box balanced on his head and a scoop in his hand; the box is full of deep-fried grasshoppers, stripped of their legs and wings, a speciality this time of year which people snack on like popcorn. He stops to say hello to the two girls, they all know each other. He scoops them a palmful of grasshoppers each as a favour and wanders off. He'll return in twenty minutes when his circular meandering brings him back this way.

It's the fine hour of a Ugandan evening. Humidity falls away so that the evening air is as soft and warm as the buttery light of sunset. Dusk – every day – is absurdly beautiful. The sky changes to baby blue and the clouds turn ivory and gold, whipped as softly as creamed cake batter. The light turns dusky, as if you were looking at the world through a veil or a mosquito screen. Suddenly there is an almost imperceptible moment of twilight perfection; so short that its over before you've even recognised it. Twilight lasts mere seconds; on the equator it turns from evening light to blanketed dark within a few moments. At ten to seven it will be the sunset hour of leisure, but by seven it will be uniform night.

A cable snakes out of the café underneath a doorframe, and reaches for my laptop. Hence, my outdoor internet connection. An hour costs about 30c euro. I watch the boda bodas whizzing up and down the road, and the passage of human traffic that is as much an evening stroll – people out to see the neighbours – as it is the route home. I'm waiting to meet a friend to go for a bite. I met Niamh from Fermanagh at Murchison Falls last weekend; both of us turned up alone and joined the same tour group. She'll arrive about an hour later, along with some people from her hostel – two I'll have met before and two I don't know, all of whom I'll most likely never see again. Sharon, a friend from work, will wander past and find me outside the internet café, so she'll end up coming along with us, and Paul, another friend who I very randomly got to know not long after I arrived in Kampala, will also drop by. We'll sit in a garden bar lit by lanterns on tables, and have a couple of beers – Kenyan Tusker or Ugandan Bell – with plates of nyama chomo - slowly-cooked, barbequed meat, with a bit of coleslaw and fries - chipsi. Around eleven, we'll have our bill added up three times before they eventually charge us the right amount, and then drift outside to laboriously negotiate with taxi and boda drivers to get home. That's how most Ugandan evenings go – food, drinks, random people, spontaneity, overcharging.

But I don't know any of that yet. For the moment, I'm happy to observe and subliminally type as I wait outside the café. I'm recovering from a day at work which stressed me out more than usual.

A typical day? There's no such thing, but this one had the hallmarks of trouble. It started when I woke before 7.00 to the sound of Jojo complaining to Mama Sharon downstairs; it sounded like he wasn't too happy about eating breakfast. I couldn't hear Mama's soothing reply from upstairs. I press snooze until 7.45 out of sheer laziness. Sarah and Jojo are already on the road to school. Throw on clothes, then down to the kitchen. Fight with flimsy matches to light the gas grill and throw in some bread to toast. It will take too long to boil water in a saucepan for tea so I don't bother. Shake my hair out and scrape on a little foundation by the mirror in the dining room while watching so the toast doesn't burn. Mama Sharon watches me, amused. Still biting down the toast when Uncle's waiting for me at the gate.

Uncle is my boda driver - he's Tata Sharon's brother. He picks me up around 8.15 and for 30c takes me over the hill to work, bumping through the stone quarry, twisting through the billowing morning dust, free-wheeling downhill on the other side to save fuel. I let myself in through the hatch in the gate and head into the office, where Joan is mopping the floors with a wet cloth, bent in half at the waist and laying her hands flat on the floor. I hook up my laptop, then later unhook it and move to the other side of the room while she mops around my desk and wipes down the table. I check to see if there's hot water in the Thermos; if not I put on the kettle and will fill the Thermos with what I don't use. Instant nescafé and two spoons of brown sugar; if we're lucky we'll have powdered milk, but we haven't had petty cash to buy more since we ran out two weeks ago.

Work; check emails and headlines. The Guardian and Irish Times are the two obligatory first-looks, but depending on what's happening in the world I'll look elsewhere later. Half my emails every day are usually from mailing lists – I've signed up to as many as possible to keep up to date on things, but it means that I'm bombarded with press releases and urgent appeals and reports.

Except this morning we don't have any internet. Ronnie has tried to call the internet company but he can't get through; this means that they're being bombarded with calls and complaints, so the whole network must be down. This is ironically a good thing as it means that we don't have a problem with our server, our account or the line into the office. The cut could last for an hour, or all day. We'll see.

In the meantime, I start typing up notes I took yesterday while talking to a human rights defender who has been in trouble this week. I met him at a training workshop we ran in Kampala, a follow up to the session in Mbale a couple of weeks ago, and the last in the current run of workshops. I won't name the defender or mention anything about his case, except to say that he'd been in detention for two days before I met him, he was bruised, had been threatened, was fleeced for bribes, and is staying with friends - essentially homeless - because they know where he lives. “They” are state actors; I won't say what kind.

We chat for half an hour between ourselves in the office, and I start looking at information I'd downloaded for research on various different things. The internet eventually comes back before 11.00 – miracle! - so I go back to the case notes and send them to an organisation working locally on human rights defenders who might be able to help, as well as to Front Line. I also check my emails, finally, and find that a press release has been issued last night in which Margaret and three other UN independent experts have condemned the recent killing of Bety Cariño in Mexico, called attention to the deteriorating situation for defenders in the country, and demanded an immediate investigation so that the perpetrators can be brought to book.

The issuing of the press release is great – the timing is bad. The press release was issued yesterday, and it's already lunchtime. I've lost valuable hours to try to send it to newspapers, journalists, bloggers and NGOs who might be interested – the most influential of which have deadlines and don't want to hear about yesterday's press releases. I start copying and pasting and emailing. In breaks between various bits of the training session yesterday I had begun listing sources which had previously reported Bety's killing as my first targets to push the press release; if they've been following the case and are interested, they're more likely to follow up.

The entire afternoon feels like a race against time, and I don't think I've been very successful. Finding contact details for the individual journalists who might be interested is maddeningly difficult. A couple of bloggers respond and thank me for the release, asking me to keep in touch if I have other information in future. At least a few potential partnerships have been made, but by 6pm this evening a search on Google News shows the statement appears on only four websites – and two of them are UN sites. I feel crushed.

The whole thing will take on a new dimension tomorrow when the Mexican government responds to the press release, criticising it as unfair and unconstructive. Of course this turns our statement into a story in a way that wouldn't have happened if they had just ignored it: most of the Mexican media report on it. Success, from our point of view. But I don't know about any of that yet, and this evening I'm tired and disappointed.

In the middle of all of this, my contact at the local defenders' organisation replies to me and tells me she has worked previously with the guy I wrote to her about, and wants to try and help. But she has been ringing his mobile phone and it's turned off; this is unusual here and she's very worried. I start trying to call him; it takes a while but I get through. He's fine, but more state actors patrolled his house all night last night, presumably to make sure he doesn't go back there or else so they can pick him up again. He is happy to hear I've been talking to the other organisations, which he will call tomorrow. I have some other ideas for things we can try to do, but they're for tomorrow.

We break for lunch quite late today, after two. Sharon goes with lunch boxes to collect food from a local lady who cooks outside her house over charcoal fires, partly shaded by a thatched shack. A meal costs under €1 and is so filling that usually I don't eat much in the evenings when I go home. The food is plain and weighted towards starches but tastier than you'd give it credit for. I'm liking it more than I would have expected although the lack of choice does get to me some times. There are days when I'd basically kill for a toasted special. Due to a combination of my having been out for a drinks the night before and it being later in the day, I am ravenous and I practically inhale my food. Today its beans, rice, greens and sweet potato – not the orange yams which we call sweet potato, but a sweet, waxy version of white potatoes which I haven't come across elsewhere.

During the afternoon I'm still trying to send out the press release, fighting to find journalists and trying to track down the troubled defender when Margaret reminds me that I was supposed to have talking points ready for her for a speech on Sunday. She's been asked to talk about employer-employee relations, not human rights related at all, and given my lack of managerial experience (!) quite a challenge for me to write about. I've been struggling with it for the last week, trying to come up with various ideas. She was happy with my initial draft but asked me to interview the others in the office so as to have a few different people's perspectives, experiences and anecdotes. I haven't been in the office for the past two days so I haven't started this at all. The problem today is that everyone else is as busy with other things as I am, and trying to pin them down and ask them dry questions about what they “most value in the workplace” takes most of the rest of the afternoon.

At this point its 5pm, normally the time we finish – I'm lucky in that people are staying late to work today. I don't have my own keys for the office so I normally finish up when the others do, usually dragging myself away from the internet connection. Working late means that I'll have time to input the answers to my workplace-related questions into the talking points. Margaret checks emails at home in the evenings and very early in the morning before coming to work, so I need to send them to her this evening. She's just heading out the door to cross town and get to a radio station in time for an interview at 7.00pm when I press send. She'll read them and can make suggestions which I can work on tomorrow before she gives the speech at the weekend.

I realise everyone's waiting for me so I frantically pack up – my laptop, charger, phone, notebooks, sunglasses – and rapidly spray on some mosquito repellent. It goes on every evening between 5 and 6pm, regardless of whether or not I'll be staying indoors, regardless or not of whether I'm wearing long pants or sleeves. I get bitten anyway, no matter what I do, but I make a show of fumigating as if it'll make me feel better. Alex has the car waiting for Margaret – I ask which direction they're taking and take a lift down the hill into Kabala. We schedule half an hour together tomorrow to review progress regarding various things – research, review projects, compilations of references from UN reports, flights to be booked - which I'm supposed to be working on. Nothing I did today was scheduled (at least not before yesterday); the two days before that, I was out of the office. As you may imagine, getting around to the longer-term projects I'm supposed to be working on is somewhat difficult.

Outside the Italian supermarket I say goodbye and jump out of the car, and decide that to kill time I may as well take a seat outside the internet café across the street, and watch the evening go by...

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Mukasa flowers

Embracing my inner botanicals at the new house...










And finally, the weird and wonderful jack fruit.... has anyone ever seen these before?! You can't really tell from the picture but they're fuzzy as velcro, neon green, and almost the size of watermelons. They look absolutely alien hanging out of the trees



Monday, May 10, 2010

Coffee time photo break

Lots of things happening the last week, most of which I'll write about about later.

I'm just back from a weekend in Murchison Falls National Park, happily acting like a tourist for the first time since I arrived, hanging out with other muzungu backpackers, soaking up the 'African wilderness' and touring around to see the animals. The park is stunningly beautiful,camping was great, and although I'm not generally a wildlife buff, seeing the animals up close and personal was amazing, and a world away from trooping around zoos or nature parks at home.

I'll write more about it later, but for now I'm so excited about some of the photos I took that I'm shamelessly publishing some of them here, while I sip my morning cup of coffee and listen to metallic rolls of thunder banging away outside, beating against Kampala's hills. Its funny to hope that someone out there might enjoy them on their own coffee break, a world or half a world away from here...





Sunrise on the Victoria Nile, 6.30am


A rain cloud passing over the Nile, and the park goes from light to dark


Victoria Nile south of Murchison Falls


Water buffalo after a mudbath




Thursday, May 6, 2010

Faith

Gate to a Muyenga compound


I've been feeling the faith down here. You don't have to look for the church to see or hear about it everywhere; the gospel songs on the radio, the programming on the television, the features and columns on faith issues in the newspapers. Women wear headscarves or crucifixes, and there is a whole street lined with stalls of bibles and rosary beads opposite a church in town. Religion, faith and morals are in the air, in conversations and in questions.

More correctly I should talk about the churches. There are many. The majority of Ugandans are Christian but this group is divided between Protestant (Anglican), Catholic and a host of other churches including a significant new movement of evangelicals. Everyone seems to have a religion and identifies with one church or another. Its normal, widespread and notably prevalent amongst youth, which for me is unusual.

On Sundays, the human traffic along the roads is scrubbed clean, dressed in Sunday best and carrying a solid, textbook-sized bible. The girls have their hair done and wear pretty dresses which would look nice on a night out. Services go on for a few hours; you usually don't see people coming from back from church until after lunchtime.

To be honest I'm impressed with the variety and range of religions down here. The overall atmosphere is of a remarkable open-mindedness and lack of judgement about religion; people chat casually about who belongs to which church, and what the differences between the churches might be. Families go together on a Sunday but I have the impression that it is very much a free choice as to which church to attend, and that young people in their twenties go along because they've become interested and gotten involved. Which is quite a contrast to a lot of the people I see at home getting dragged along to mass by their parents, hungover of a Sunday.

Religion is important to Ugandans and – to my limited knowledge – is detached entirely from the State and the general education and health system (more or less; there are of course religious schools and at least one Islamic University). The churches are detached from the political context, although Church leaders preach on public issues, the influence of which I wouldn't discount.

“And what religion are you? Do you attend church?”

It comes up very early on in conversations with Ugandans, a polite enquiry. Its neither nosey nor presumptuous, just curious and interested. To me, as a question, it represents a touching presumption of faith; it implies a faith that you must have a connection to some religion, because everyone does. To me, this seems almost like a faith in faith itself.

In response, despite the local tolerance about these things, I have always identified myself as Catholic. It simply seems like too much trouble to explain that I'm not very religious and don't often go to mass, although I was raised Catholic and christened and attended a convent school. Its not that I'm afraid that people will disapprove, just that they wouldn't fully understand, and would want to talk it out. And for me there isn't a lot to talk about.

Some colleagues at the office, when I explained recently that Ugandans' casual interest in the topic is somewhat unusual for me, responded that it's a normal question just so new acquaintances know where they stand.

“It lets you know what you can put on the table”, explained Ronnie, the eligible bachelor of the office. It took me a few minutes to realise that he meant this literally – that people want to know about your religion so that they know what they can offer each other to eat and drink! Uganda has a minority but strong Muslim community, and – I hadn't know this before – members of several of the evangelical Christian churches also don't eat pork.

So in one sense I'm pretty impressed by the tolerance. Perhaps religion isn't an issue because Ugandans focus far more on a sense of tribal identity and loyalty, which is a source of real and potentially divisive tensions. Tribal identities are ancient and ancestral; in contrast, all religions in Uganda are relatively new and at one point or another were a matter of choice. Nowhere more so is this element of choice visible than in relation to the growth of “new” churches such as evangelicals and Jehovah's Witness, business for which is more or less booming. This is particularly the case for youth; many of the converts are young, possibly choosing the new churches over more established ones which their families attended.

I'm not sure how I feel about this. The driving force behind this new movement is mainly American, and I think what I dislike about it is how commercialised it seems. To give one example, the channel with the best reception on the three televisions I've used since arriving down here has been an evangelical Christian channel which broadcasts free to air. I've never seen a black or African face on air. All of their programs are American preachers giving sermons, Christian talk shows or gospel concerts, which are shown in short segments between very long ad breaks, which only seem to promote expensive, mail order Christian tapes, books and DVDs.

I was amused and entertained by the bible bashers who stand on roundabouts around Kampala in the clouds of exhaust fumes, gesturing wildly, thumping their bible and roaring the word of God above the grinding and beeping of rush hour traffic. At home they would have a sign warning us that the END IS NIGH, but at home they're always middle aged or older. Here, they are usually under 30.

“How long do they stand there?!” I asked Margaret once, in the car.

“Oh, all day,” she replied. It turns out they're paid to preach, although no one seems to listen. Raving at roundabouts is literally a full time job.

This kind of active marketing or recruitment to religion makes me deeply uncomfortable, although I'm not sure why. Add in rumours of American evangelical influence in supporting and triggering the current (and if you ask me, horrific) Anti-Homosexuality Bill (although thankfully some leading church figures such as Rick Warren have now publicly criticised the Bill), and I cannot shake off my doubts. Justify Full

What's really funny for me though, if I'm going to be honest, is how people talk about it.

Margaret's driver Alex was taking me home a couple of weeks ago, and we mentioned a particular guy both of us knew (who is, I think, in his twenties or perhaps early thirties).

“He is Saved,” Alex said solemnly, in a very matter of fact way.

“Oh he is religious?” I asked.

“Oh yes”.

I tried to be respectful and absorbed this information as best I could. “Are you Saved, Alex?”

He smiled ruefully, amused by this question. “No, no”, he replied.

“Do you go to church?”

He laughed openly. “No!”

This amused me no end. To talk solemnly about people being Saved, as if it was a tangible state of being or a concrete fact like membership of a political party, would only make sense to me if I shared the same view. Detached observers down here do not poke fun at the church. The slightly pitying tone used by non-believers back home when talking about religion is absent. Ugandans lack the implied cynicism with which people discuss the church in Ireland; a cynicism so pervasive that I had never noticed or identified it until I was surprised by its absence.

A few days later I was taking a boda home and the driver was chatty. We were whizzing through Kabalagala at the time, an eternally chaotic, buzzing neighbourhood full of bars and markets and food being sold from street stalls. It was a Saturday evening and traffic was busy, the roads full of people heading home after their week's work.

“You are born again?” he asked me casually, over his shoulder.

“Am I what?!”

“Have you been born again?”

“Oh no, no,” I replied, trying not to giggle, and hoping that he would stop looking over his shoulder at me and watch the road instead. “Which church do you go to?”

“Jehovah”, he replied. In a Ugandan accent it richly sounds Jegh-oww-vahh. “What church are you?”

“Catholic”. He looked sceptical. “Almost all Irish people are Catholic,” I explained. He didn't look like he believed me. “So you go to your meeting tomorrow?” I asked, trying to change the conversation.

“Oh yes. You come with me? I pick you up and take you on boda.”

It was getting harder not to giggle. “Oh, no, thanks.”

“No? Why not? You should try. You would like.”

“Oh, I don't think so. I think I'll stick with the Catholic church, its ok for me”. He opened his mouth to continue and I was beginning to sense the commencement of a campaign. “My mother would be very upset if I changed,” I added hastily.

He nodded sagely and turned back to the road. He understood. The matter was out of my hands.

Who says women are powerless!